Monday, July 26, 2010

Nexus One -- We will miss you!!





The Nexus One is DEAD. And there is no Nexus 2 planned. This is so sad. Sometime back, I had blogged about Nexus One being the closest competitor to Apple's iPhone had. Little did I know, I will be writing this post in the same month. Moreover, the recent positive news around Android 2.2 launch, announcements to retail Nexus one with Verizon/Sprint had led me to believe that Google would be making some more serious investments in it's phone business.

But then I found this floating around,

Alas, the Nexus One never lived up to its promise and the expectations set for it. Great software that can also be found on other Android smartphones, combined with weak hardware, a marginal wireless provider, and a weird Web-only sales model doomed the device to failure. <Link>

Before I dissect other things, Weak hardware, really?? Nexus One, with Android 2.2 was lightning fast. The author obviously did not check for facts

But was nexus was a complete DUD? If Not, why did Google pull the plug on it?

Android emergence as the platform OS of choice for smartphones was a big win. It was not only fast, but designed bottom up to offer the user a great user experience. Then why? Sales are being cited as one reason. That could be true, at least partially.  Did mighty Google fail to execute on the field plan for its shiny,shiny phone? Or it was just about showcasing Android supremacy? We will never know.

While, I agree Andriod's  ubiquitous presence on the smartphone of today is not the only reason to keep Nexus One alive. There are bigger things at play here. 

Just for a moment, if we were to take a step back and analyse Apple's new iPhone 4 offering.  

By now the much publicized antennaegate ("death grip") problem, out dated features (Hats off to the marketing whiz kids at Apple for pushing through features of yesterday with so much pomp. A 5 MP camera in version 4 phone? Multi-tasking OS? Who would have thunk?) But still, Apple has built some serious street cred, and the numbers are beyond impressive. The fan boys and fan girls have done their bit in keeping the AAPL stock rocking the NASDAQ charts over last year.


What Apple has done is something everyone should learn from. They do not have the latest and greatest hardware, and they are not the first to the market by far. Yet, they have paid an insane amount of attention to user experience, and all the other things which everyone thought were not important. They took their time. Did not rush it. And they have got it right. The results are there for everyone to see. They have changed the game not by being first to the market, but by being last one of the blocks.

Why is all this important?

It is because, whether you like it or not, smartphones are the converged devices of the future. The place where all your Apps live. And I can't see HTC (with all the goody-ness of Android), Nokia, Sony, Palm or anyone else (Microsoft Kin?? :D) coming close to pushing Apple off the the throne. The only true competitor I saw who could inspire such a paradigm shift and aim for the Apple's pie, was Google. 

I might be wrong. (Hopefully, I am!)

Monday, July 19, 2010

World Cup' 2010..

[I have been an ardent soccer fan, and a player since my childhood. I truly find it a beautiful game. ]

After the 4 years of waiting, the world cup finally arrived, and before you knew it the month was over. :(

Yes, the World Cup is over. And just like any other, it has been an eventful one. A world cup is not without its moments and this one had many. Some come together and some fall apart.

Italy’s shock exit. France’s dressing room brawls and exit. England’s lackluster display and exit. Brazil’s exit [Yes, that one broke my heart]. Anelka sent home after a spat with the coach. I am pretty sure there are people in Africa, sticking needles into Suarez voodoo dolls. Group of Death. Portugal’s slaughter of the “other” Korea. Rooney’s outburst. Cristiano Ronaldo’s showboating and an unnamed baby. Messi’s sparkle of brilliance. Argentina versus Germany. Germany versus Spain. Kaka’s red Card. OctoPaul. Maradona’s theatrics. Magical midfield skills. Never seen before celebrations. And there were some new young stars. Referee Blunders. Amazing goals, even more amazing fighting spirit.  Vuvuzelas. Waka Waka.  And there were many more..! Check out Big Picture for some stunning snaps, which barely capture the euphoria of the month that’s gone by.

But the most important one, the Spanish Armada lifting the cup, and for the first time. They surely painted the town red.

Watching the televised final was indeed a special affair. I had a special first timer watching it 'with' me. 


I intend to watch the next one (2014) in Brazil. Some skeptics are raising questions about Brazil’s capability to host the soccer summit in 4 years time.  

[* On a separate note, hosting the soccer world cup is  not as easy as you might think. I think South Africa did a fabulous job of hosting it this time. Events like can go a long way to change peoples perception about Africa as a whole. {True, S.A. has always been  an African powerhouse, but compared to my last visit there, it has undergone a complete makeover to be able to host an event of this scale and magnitude}. They also staged a very successful edition of IPL-2, followed by T20 Cricket world Cup. More on this later! Also, is there something India could learn here, given we can’t seem to get ready for Commonwealth Games 2010? Fingers Crossed.]


But I intend to go nonetheless, would not miss it for the world. It’s my Woodstock!

And the wait begins,
A Brazil fan since ‘94

Sunday, July 11, 2010

The Politics of it all...

Brevity is overrated. In my world, it is indeed. I am such a sucker for details. Of course, being articulate is an enviable quality to posses. But sometimes those long verbose, unwieldy dialogues are much more revealing than short, succinct responses.


[Don’t get me wrong, I am not asking you trade in lively, incisive discussions for boring speeches, like the ones that some of our politicians make!]

Speaking of which, I watched Rajneeti the other day. Although the movie was not about what I had thought it would be, I came out feeling good. Ranbir Kapoor’s dark side, scheming yet restrained, was definitely something which kept me engrossed. {On a tangential note his character reminded me of how we continuously think how a ‘clean’ man can’t enter and survive mainstream ‘politics’. You have to sell your sell your soul and cross over to the dark side.} Nana Patekar was his usual brilliant self, and it would have been so amazing to have him and Naseeruddin Shah in the same frame. But it was not to be. Manoj Bajpai has always been a draw for me, ever since his Satya days. The movie is largely about dynastic politics and the in-fighting in a powerful family which holds the state ransom to its whims and fancies. While the cast gives the movie much needed impetus, it failed to impress me much. It could have been so much better. The dialogues were uncannily weak and subdued. While this one-time watch is not a complete down, but with contextual similarities to Mahabharata and Godfather, I expected much more from Prakash Jha. Enough said, since my cinematic reviewing skills are very, very limited at best I would encourage Jabberwock’s review of the movie. Brilliant.

On a separate note, the opposition parties called for a nationwide “bandh” on Monday against price rise. They were supposedly doing it only for the common man, the daily wage earner. The spiraling costs due to inflation have hit most sections of the Indian society. The issue warrants concern and should surely be dealt with urgency, but a nationwide bandh?? Grr…. What does that achieve?

[I do not have any political leanings, and no favorites to speak of. But a deep interest in observing our elected representatives compels me to give in to the following rant]

The BJP top brass (Party president Mr. Gadkari, senior leaders like Mr. Jaitley, Rajnath Singh and several others) came out to the streets in protest. Some political leaders courted arrested, while others were more like strategic generals who only cracked the whip from their comfort zones. Sharad Yadav was quick to declare the bandh representative of the people’s verdict on the issue. Mr. Chandrababu Naidu warned of increased agitation if their demands were not met. Mrs. Karat, was quick to declare, and repeatedly asserted later, the CPI (M) was not joining hands with the BJP, and the issue was not a political one but one where people had come out to protest against the unilateral decision making of the government. She seemed extremely concerned with people doubting CPI(M)’s ideological purity since they choose to align with their sworn enemies, BJP. The CPI (M) and other Left parties do not suffer from vacillations and compromises to which the Congress was prone, she claimed in one televised interview.

The Bandh was successful, declared all the parties in unison. But was it? Did people down shutters because they are in agreement with the opposition’s decisions or was it because they feared physical harassment and damage to their properties/shops?

As expected, congress was also extremely quick in terming the bandh a nuisance. It went as far as to call the bandh anti-people and accused the opposition of being irresponsible. Our Finance Minister, Pranab Da, urged the people to look beyond “the cheap and opportunistic politics at the cost of the nation.” He also ruled  out a re-visit to his decision to de-regulate the fuel prices.

Sigh.

Personally, my irritation began on Friday itself. When I was writing an email to my US counterparts to inform them that the Indian office would be shut due to a nationwide Bandh, I was kind of ashamed.

[I almost typed in that we too were celebrating the American Independence day!]

In this day and age, it is almost preposterous. It just did not make sense. I get it that people want to protest against certain policies of the government and it is their fundamental right to do so. BUT, it is my fundamental right to NOT be a part of it. I am pretty sure the constitution states that the right to expression should be carried out peacefully. Why enforce the bandh? It will only make me question the validity of such a bandh. Who actually went out and protested? Was it the common man or a bunch of for-hire gundas, or simply misguided party workers? How is burning of 100 buses, interrupting rail and air traffic and disrupting public life of any benefit to the common man? Why did the leaders of the opposition fail to engage the government in a meaningful dialogue over the price rise issue in the regular parliament sessions? Oh wait, they can’t do that. They are to busy interrupting the proceedings, hurling chappals, calling names and staging walk-outs. Are the opposition parties simply there to oppose anything the government (or a particular party in power) says? School and college goers rejoiced as most schools remained shut. Working professionals could not care less as long as they got an extended weekend to enjoy the World Cup madness.

I know of a particular instance, wherein a company {which without being named is part of one of the most trusted and respected industrial groups in India} which was working despite the bandh being announced, was arm twisted into shutting down. A group of hooligans entered the official premises & went from floor to floor, terrorizing the employees till the senior management rued their earlier decision to remain open. Banking operations were disrupted in several states. The daily wage laborers, who this bandh was supposed to protect, lost a day’s wage. Most of us will have to work an extra Saturday in lieu of the forced holiday on Monday. I still remember a particular snap in one of the newspapers, where a bride looked very sullen, as most of the guests could not show up for her wedding. This was supposed to be the happiest day of her life.

These so called elected representatives, messiahs of the comman man, are hardly common men and women. What is common about them? They are in most cases elitist, power drunk and very rich. Are they willing to give up the free fuel, electricity, water and other perks like chauffeured transport, armored security and residences in plush locales? I do not find them stranded in traffic? Neither is any one of them by my side when police turn to harassing general public and refuse to register FIRs.

In all this chaos, few things did not quite catch the limelight. It was originally BJP, who had proposed the de-regulation of fuel prices. Of course, they will plead higher inflation. But our Oil companies have been running into heavy losses, financial prudence dictates that we allow the free market to take over. In every country tax cess on fuel is a variable component of the total fuel price. In US it is 19% of the price, in Japan it is 43%. In India it is 39%. That is steep and while I could definitely use a little deflation, is the correct answer to give in and continue with subsidies? Do subsidies doled out really help? They are designed to help the poor(er) people. But the fact is the benefits of cheaper fuel do not necessarily percolate down to the very poor. The same benefits are enjoyed by people riding a 2 wheeler bajaj scooter as well as the young couple driving in their new Mercedes. While I am not sure if subsidies should be done away with, we should definitely revisit them if and evaluate if they actually achieve their purpose. Is there not a better solution to this problem?

Another thing which emerged, which I did not know of is that the bandh was noticeably worse in the states ruled by the opposition parties. Life was disturbed to a lesser extent in Cong ruled states.

[Is it that people in Cong ruled states do not mind the hike in fuel prices or do you sense something else here?]

Apparently, Congress had proposed to all state governments to reduce the sales tax from the current highs to offset the fuel price hikes. And now to anybody that would be a sensible move, right? After all, all the politicians are concerned about is the strain on our purse strings. And any relief, howsoever little, is going to help. But most of the states ruled by opposition parties declined. Why? Because sales tax collected goes to state ministry coffers as opposed to the central government. Sheesh! My mind is boggling at this point. And I am not sure if I can continue to draw any rational conclusions anymore.

Are these the people we have elected? Do we really have a choice? What kind of message are we sending to the other countries? Is India truly ready for prime-time as everyone believes? I wonder. Regardless, I will always remember that on July 5th India was held hostage by the very custodians of our democratic rights.

Saturday, July 10, 2010

Joel's in a soup... no make that a Spicy Indian curry!

Joel Stein caused nothing short of an internet tidal wave, when T.I.M.E. ran his article, My own Private India. Rarely have I seen an article cause so much acrimony on the web. Facebookdom, Twitterverse and blogosphere erupted with reactions and counter-reactions. I am pretty sure there is a reaction out there echoing your thoughts on the subject, no matter what they are. Kal penn reacted, & so did Sandip roy as well as the Geat Bong. Personally, I re-read the article a week later yesterday and I did not think much of it.


In my several discussions about it, I liked the reaction that came from madame pixiedust.


The sheer amount of attention that Joel Stein’s article is getting is what really disturbs me, and not really the “humor” that he seemed to be projecting in his piece. It was an ostensibly funny article that makes superficial and unimaginative digs at the brown folks taking over Edison, an apparent nostalgic piece of how his hometown was metamorphosing before his own eyes. However, the irreverence of the article is what exactly it deserves to get.



Unfortunately, a lot of humor involves attacking stereotypes – digs at Americans are a case in point. But I am not sure what constitutes crossing a line? Do you not make any such digs at all? Or you do and then issue a footnote explaining the why, how, when of it? Do you only make racist jokes in an explicitly comedic environment (as our beloved stand-up comedians do) to ensure that they are not taken seriously? Or do you also make a joke about yourself to ensure a safety net – after all he who can laugh at himself can laugh at anything right? It is difficult to ascertain such complexities given jokes are often funny when they are being directed at issues that come with some tension, ideas that some people take just too seriously. To a certain extent I concur, that the person making the joke should be mindful of his audience and the climate before cracking something irreverent about something that could be sensitive. But in general, when you are broadcasting a joke, it is difficult to control this. Really, opening your mouth to spew out humor is always risky. Because you are more often than not targeting a topic that could be very serious to someone, anyone else.


In light of this, we probably need to react contextually. Especially for an article like the one that Stein wrote only because it accomplishes nothing. It is neither nostalgic, nor funny, nor imaginative. Nothing that he says has not been said before. Am I the only one who thinks that this article does not deserve the attention it is getting?



+1.

All I want to say is T.I.M.E. should have probably seen this coming.

Sunday, July 04, 2010

Apple (iPhone4) versus Google (nexus One)

Just when you thought Apple could hardly do anything wrong after successfully overtaking Microsoft, as the world’s biggest software company, the by now well publicized iPhone4 fiasco antennae problem exploded. While the die-hard apple fan boys /girls remain devout to Steve Jobs and Co., this could be the foot in the door that Google has been looking for its Nexus One phone. Not that it needs an incident like this but things like this and this hurt... The Nexus One has some amazing specs, and is lighting fast given the release of the new Android OS 2.2. Recently I picked up a Nexus One for a friend and have subsequently been playing with it, and I might just give into it. It’s pretty neat, and Google have definitely added nice finishing touches to the phone. The android app marketplace also seems to be doing really well and has definitely come a long way. Hmmm… The battle for the best smart phone on the market seems to be taking on new hues as Google recently announced that they would cease their online-purchase-only policy for the Nexus One and retail it directly in stores, and Verisign announcing that they would get to retail the iPhone as well..! Let’s wait..

The longest match in Tennis history..

.. was played at this year’s Wimbeldon between John Isner and Nicholas Mahut. An epic battle which lasted little over than 11 hours. The match also saw a total of 216 aces , a scoreboard failure and finished with a score-line of 6–4, 3–6, 6–7(9–7), 7–6(7–3), 70–68. Phew! It does not matter who won the match, but for those who missed it, would you catch a replay? :)


Update: Someone pointed me to this. This is what you might experience when watching a replay of the day's event!